美国枪法律法规英文

A. 美国各州枪支法律 中文版 谢谢

200金币想买到这么多内容，你想多了。
美国基本上每个州 对枪支的法律都不同。
细节很多，你想要全部内容，建议花上200美金去美国法律书店买一本，个人认为，某宝都不一定有。
祝你好运。

B. 美国虽然是一个允许拥有枪支的国家，但请问美国的法律如何规范用枪（请回答详细点，重金悬赏）

法案限制

美国公民或移民签证/绿卡持有者可以购买枪支。
非移民签证(学生，商务，工作等)持有者在所在州超过3个月可以购买长枪，但需要有狩猎执照和SSN。
不可以购买枪支的还有:
犯有重罪或某些轻罪，逃犯，非法毒品使用者，患有某些精神疾病者，非法移民，放弃美国公民身份的人，开除军籍的军人，未成年人，受人身限制令限制的，犯有家庭暴力罪的。
另外受到刑事起诉面临一年以上刑期的人不允许接受，运送，发运枪支和弹药。
年满21岁可以购买手枪
年满18岁可以购买长枪(步枪和霰弹枪)
私人之间不可以跨州买卖，必须通过有执照的销售商。
个人可以通过网上订购枪支，但必须从本州有执照的销售商取货。
枪支管理
持枪是受美国宪法（第二修正案）保障的公民权利，既然是公民权利就是所有没有重罪记录的成年公民都可以持枪。但是宪法没有规定枪支的类型，所以给联邦和各州对于枪支管理有不同的解释。大多数州对非全自动长枪限制较少，通过即时犯罪前科检查没有问题的可以立即买枪且不需要注册登记，也就是政府不知道谁有枪。购买手枪的要求一般高一些，有些州需要登记。
一些枪支法律比较友善的州，只要交钱填表再经过非常严格的审查，基本上可以买到任何限制的轻武器(机枪，全自动步枪，短枪管步枪，消声器等)。枪支法律较严的州(加州，纽约州，伊利诺州等)需要考枪牌。
50个州中有48个州允许隐匿持枪(手枪上膛随身携带)，这些州中的大部分需要考持枪证，合格的话一定要发证。没有隐匿持枪证的话带枪外出每个州的法律基本上都要枪支空膛上锁并和弹药分开放在汽车后备箱或直接拿不到的地方。只要合法，枪支携带没有什么地域限制，坐飞机也可以(枪支上锁托运)。

年龄限制

2018 年2月22日，美国将把最低购枪年龄的门槛从18岁提高到21岁，实行更严格的购枪者背景审查程序，禁用“撞火枪托”等装置。

C. 关于美国枪支的英文PPT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States
里面有需要的美国枪控

D. 美国枪械法的各州市纷繁的枪械法

如果你想了解各州的规定，你可以到美国步枪协会的网页上去查询，他们有很详尽各州的资料。
一般而言，各地的警察局， 是负责管理的单位。小地方的警长，有绝对的权力。大城市裹，就可能要经过好几个单位，有时，连一般的的警察也搞不清楚繁复的法令。 还好一般的枪店都对当地的情况十分清楚，他们也会很乐意帮忙，因为帮了你也等于给他们提供一个潜在的客户。 在这里，要强调当地两个字，有如以上所说的，各州(State)，各乡(County)，各市(City， Town)都可能有不一样的规定， 一过了界，就可能大不相同。 譬如说长岛(Long Island， New York)的枪店，对纽约市(New York City， New York)的规定可能就不是那么清楚，就算知道，他也可能没有必要的表格。 千万要搞清楚，不要莫名其妙的犯了法，还不知道是为什么呢。 在纽约州，各式各样的半自动步枪并不列入管制，但是在纽约市，就完全是另一回事了，半自动步枪如果有以下的一样特征，就属于非法：
突出的手枪把，
弹匣容量超过五发，
枪口制退器，
刺刀座，
榴弹发射器，
有节上护盖，
折合式枪托，
按照这个规定，所有的M16，M14，AK，SKS类型步枪都属于非法。
同一州尚且如此，何况是别的地方。所以要谈枪械管制，必须要先讲清楚是那一个州。
一般来说，东北部管的比较严，可是也有例外，像缅因州(Maine)，新罕布什尔州(New Hampshire)就很松。中西部管的比较松，可是也有例外，芝加哥(Chicago)从一九八六年起，不允许私人拥有手枪，号称无枪市。那才是个大笑话，芝加哥的黑社会，人人有枪，连十岁小孩都有枪，是美国枪械犯罪最严重的都市之一。而美国总有一些政客异想天开，认为他们所有的问题，都是因为枪械公司引起的，所以二十几个市政府一齐具状告入法庭， 一共告了二十几家枪械制造公司－包括了格拉克(Glock)，贝瑞塔(Beretta)等， 几乎一网打尽所有的名厂，他们认为有了烟草业赔偿的先例，他们也应该稳操胜算。 在一九九九年许多州立法， 禁止任何市政府控告枪厂或只能雇用按时计酬的律师(因为如此， 律师们就不能采拆帐分赃的方式获利， 恶讼师们对此也就失去了兴趣)等等相应措施， 为反枪械管制扳回一成。 纽约市分成五个区 ━ 曼哈顿区Manhattan， 布鲁克林(布鲁仑) 区Brooklyn， 皇后Queens区， 史泰登岛区Staten Island 及 布朗士区Bronx， 实行相同的枪械管制法， 可以私人拥有枪械。
步枪比较简单的， 采用登记制， 只要是纽约市不禁止的， 随时可以购买， 没有限制。 AK， SKS， M16， USR 等是禁止的， Mini-14， Ruger 10/22， M1A等属于合法。 在要开始的时候，， 先到皇后大道(Queens Blvd., 在Union Turnpike)上最高法院(Queens Court)的一个步枪管制中心去申请一张枪证， 需相片两张和七十元汇票(邮局就在旁边)。 大约等三个月， 枪证会寄下来。 此后就可以到枪店去买步枪。 买了之后， 枪商或你自己， 要将一张出售证明， 寄到Queens 的步枪管制中心去存档。
手枪比较麻烦。 手枪的许可证有许多种， 有一种是居家证(Residential Permit)， 没什么用途， 只能放在家里以及在指定的日子带到靶场去。 而带枪证(Conceal Carry Permit)一般人是几乎不可能拿到的， 在此只谈谈打靶证(Target Permit)。 首先要加入一个射击俱乐部， 一般有靶场的枪店都有附设俱乐部， 然后要到纽约市警局(在曼哈顿的下城， Police Plaza， 市府旁边)去按指纹， 交申请书和费用， 枪店可以代为填表， 但是必须本人到警局去完成手续。 前后开支大约要五百元左右。 缴了申请表之后， 大约三个月左右， 警察局会通知申请人去面谈， 如果一切顺利， 大约六个月左右可以拿打靶证和一张许可证(Purchase permit)， 可以买一把手枪!!! 手枪的购买必须在许可证发出后的三十天之内完成， 否则失效。 买了枪之后， 必须在四十八小时内把枪带到市警局呈检。 这样才算完成所有合法的程序。 三个月后， 可以再申请购买， 购买许可证大约要等两个月左右， 而且申请书上要声明所要的口径。
附带的规定有， 没有手枪枪照的人， 不得”持有”(Posses)， 也就是说不可以租枪或是把玩。 (所以在纽约州州界之内， 除了军人， 执法人员和少数特例之外， 将手枪交到没有手枪枪照的人手上， 就犯了法。 一九九八年电视上某次辩论枪械管制问题时， 有一位外地来的手枪管制协会的人， 在节目中拿了一把手枪指指点点， 由于录影室在曼哈顿， 事后NRA就公开质问纽约市市警局， 为什么没有将他逮捕? 可见执法不公)。 持打靶证的人， 只能在”直接”往返靶场时带着枪， 途中必须是空枪(Unloaded)， 而且放在一个锁起来的容器(Locked box)中。 法规中言明， 每人以一把枪为原则， 也就是说， 让不让买第二把手枪， 完全是由他。
这些规定， 光看头都昏了。 如果住在纽约市的朋友想要买枪， 最好的办法， 是在电话簿上找一家有靶场的枪店， 去和他们谈一谈， 他们一般都很愿意帮忙的。千万不要相信任何人声称可以代办或者走后门， 这我不敢说没有， 只是我不信你运气那么好。

E. 求英语作文：关于美国人用枪权利问题

Gun Control Essay Since disarming the citizens of this country is the objective of the federal government, and since the federal government proclaims this to be a democratic country based upon equality, then any gun control measures adopted by the government should be democratically applied. If law abiding citizens are to have their guns taken from them then let the law abiding police agencies of the state be disarmed also. (Those in law enforcement who are crooked can keep their guns just as the drug pushers and criminal elements in the civilian population at large will keep theirs.) Democracy based on equality requires that, so far as possible all are to be democratically equal. Why should the police, FBI, and federal marshals remain armed while citizens are not? Let us look at this issue in an intelligent, reasonable manner and examine the arguments. It will be said of those in favor of non-democratic gun control that the police come into contact with dangerous criminal elements and need guns to defend themselves as well as to enforce the laws. This is, of course, quite true, but is it not equally true for the citizens of this country? Are they not the chief victims of crime? Do they not need to protect themselves? In most cases, the policeman or FBI agent is much more able to defend himself as a result of training, physical conditioning, and experience than, say, a woman at a shopping mall who is dragged into an attacker's van and raped while her child is beaten unconscious by the assailant. Why, in a equal democratic society, would laws be passed that would provide a pistol for the police officer and not for the woman? Does not the woman as a citizen enjoy the same right to self defense as a police officer? Do not citizens have the same right to defend themselves as FBI agents? For every law enforcement officer that comes into contact with a criminal there are 7,653 citizens that are victimized by criminals. A citizen is 800 times more likely to be the victim of crime than a law enforcement officer, yet those who control the Federal government in Washington wish to make it illegal for any citizens to defend himself! The best place to stop crime is at the time of it's occurrence; in other words, were the 7,653 citizens armed they could in most cases prevent the crime at the point of it's occurrence. The police almost always arrive at the scene of a crime after the occurrence of the crime. Logically speaking, if the rules governing gun ownership are to be un-democratically applied, it makes far more sense to disarm the police than the citizens. The police can of course, once the one week waiting period is over, obtain a firearm just like citizens. Their arms should, however, be kept under lock and key at the police station. Then, just like citizens, if they get into trouble they can call 911 for armed help to come save them. One week waiting periods before the purchase of a firearm should be democratically applied. If it makes sense for a citizen to be required to wait a week in order to buy a firearm for protection, then it makes equally good sense for the police and FBI to do the same. Innocent people are killed every year by both agencies. If enforcement agencies had to wait a week before they could get a pistol, countless lives would be saved. A true example of this type of situation occurred recently in Houston, Texas where two armed robbers held up a large super market. The police advised of a hold up in progress placed officers at all exits. As the holp progressed and shoppers became aware of the stickup, several tried to flee the robbers. The first three shoppers out the door were shot by a female police officer, two died. How does a one week waiting period sound for this police officer? Now, it can be argued that most officers never shoot an innocent person with their side arms. Quite true. The same is true for most citizens who own guns. If our cites are so safe that citizens do not need guns, then the President's secret service guards should be disarmed. Is the president any more deserving of his life than the citizens who elected him? Democracy, where art thou? It seems clear that government elitists don't trust citizens who own guns. Can citizens trust a government who owns all the guns? Perhaps the federal government has something planned for the citizens of America that requires them to be disarmed? Bought any stock in the "New World Order" yet? It's originators, socialist elitists in Washington D.C., specify that worldwide disarmament must be instituted for the NWO to begin. You did not really think that this just meant foreign armies did you? Of course the enforcers of the NWO are to be allowed to keep their guns. How else can they see that you, a simple citizen, go along with their program? One has to ask himself what kind of country this would be if only criminals and government agents have arms. Perhaps the simple peasants who were in Tienanmen Square, or the Croatian and Slovakian citizens seen throwing rocks at tanks can best answer this question. Gun control works. Ask any government agent from Red Square to the steps of the White House. For those who can think, the words "gun control" or "New World Order" instinctively cause us to throw a thirty round clip into our weapon, for we are aware that the biggest criminals are the ones who live in Washington D.C.

采纳哦

F. 您好,在网上看到您有关于美国枪支管理之类的英文原文,能给我发一下吗,谢谢,急用.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/06/gun-control-america
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/07/07/the-rise-of-gun-violence-as-a-public-health-issue

G. 美国枪击事件频发，美国宪法都颁布过哪些相关规定

《美国宪法》修正案第二条规定：“一支训练有素的民兵，对一个自由州的安全实为必要，民众拥有并且佩带枪支的权利不容侵犯。”这就是美国人可以在一些约束条件下持有枪支的法律依据。

宪法第二修正案于1791年写入宪法，属于闻名于世界的“权利法案”的中的一条，紧随保护言论自由的宪法第一修正案。由此可见保护佩带枪支权利的悠久历史。这个就是美国人可以在一些约束条件下持有枪支的法律依据。

原因有下：

那么，人民如何使用权利废除违背人民意愿的政府？当时宪法起草人杰佛逊认为，只有百姓有持枪权才能将这种权力付诸实践。美国宪法规定，任何条文可以根据将来的情况加以修改，但百姓自由持枪这一条绝对不能改，因此，它被写在了美国宪法第二条修正案当中：“人民持有和携带武器的权利不得侵犯。”

H. 美国使用枪支的由来介绍中英版 可包括一些恐怖事件的翻译 急用 谢谢

American gun culture has a long history. It came into being in the early America. In the 16th century, when the initial（最初的） batch（一批） of European immigrants settled in American continent, they often faced with fierce animals’ attacks, conflictions with American Indians and European Powers’ invasions. Under these circumstances, a gun played an increasing important role in defending peoples’ personnel safeties(人生安全). In the Independences War, militias’ decisive contribution strengthened American people’s senses of owning a gun. Militias’ first gunshot in Lexington(莱克星敦) drawn open for Independence War. Since then, according to many Americans, the United States could gain the independence because of every James holding a gun. In Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, American 16th president, encouraged every citizen to possess a gun. Therefore, American people regarded having a gun as an inalienable(不可剥夺的) right.
In the provisions of Bill of Right, the second is that every James has the right to holding a gun. It is the legal basis of population of a gun in the USA. So to speak, a gun like hamburgers, hotdogs and rock music has become an indispensable(不可或缺的)part of American culture.
这都是我自己写的，都比较简单。我就省去中文翻译了，希望对你有帮助

I. 求英文原句:人民有拿起枪反抗暴政的天赋权利（美国宪法）

1 美国开国元勋托马斯·杰斐逊（第三任美国总统）曾有一句名言：“只有一个国家的统治者被随时提醒，人民保留有反抗的精神，这个国家才能保持自由。让人民拿起武器来吧!”
2 美国宪法第二条修正案规定：“管理良好的民兵是保障自由州的安全所必需,人民持有和携带武器的权利不得侵犯。”
这是美国历史上第一部也是最具权威性的关于公民持枪权的法律规定，美国公民拥有枪支是合法行为，受宪法等一系列法律保护。该修正案并不是说宪法给了人民拥有武器的权利，而是说，人民拥有和携带武器的权利不可侵犯。美国的建国者认为，这种权利，不是任何人给予人民的一种恩赐，而是一种天赋人权。

因此，求英文原句，恐难如愿

1789年生效的《宪法修正案》也叫《权利法案》的持枪条款：
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” “组织良好的民兵队伍，对于一个自由国家的安全是必需的，人民拥有和携带武器的权利不可侵犯。”

J. 关于中国和美国枪支管理区别的英语作文

The Control of Guns 26 Last week, there was unexpected disaster happened in Kunming, a group of gangster showed up in the Kunming train station, took out their knives, cutting people, many people died of the accident. What a tragical accident. It reminds me of the gun shot accidents happened in campus in America. America is not so strict to the control of guns, people can buy guns when they get registered, people can use the gun to hunt animals. While the lose management of the guns brings many tragedies, there is always news about gun shot accident in campus, the murders are teenagers. People are shocked by the news, they call on the government to control the guns, in case the teenagers have access to the guns. Compared to America, our country is very strict to the guns, so the gangsters of Kunmingdisaster use knives instead of guns. The government has done a good job on gun management.