美國槍法律法規英文

A. 美國各州槍支法律 中文版 謝謝

200金幣想買到這么多內容，你想多了。
美國基本上每個州 對槍支的法律都不同。
細節很多，你想要全部內容，建議花上200美金去美國法律書店買一本，個人認為，某寶都不一定有。
祝你好運。

B. 美國雖然是一個允許擁有槍支的國家，但請問美國的法律如何規范用槍（請回答詳細點，重金懸賞）

法案限制

美國公民或移民簽證/綠卡持有者可以購買槍支。
非移民簽證(學生，商務，工作等)持有者在所在州超過3個月可以購買長槍，但需要有狩獵執照和SSN。
不可以購買槍支的還有:
犯有重罪或某些輕罪，逃犯，非法毒品使用者，患有某些精神疾病者，非法移民，放棄美國公民身份的人，開除軍籍的軍人，未成年人，受人身限制令限制的，犯有家庭暴力罪的。
另外受到刑事起訴面臨一年以上刑期的人不允許接受，運送，發運槍支和彈葯。
年滿21歲可以購買手槍
年滿18歲可以購買長槍(步槍和霰彈槍)
私人之間不可以跨州買賣，必須通過有執照的銷售商。
個人可以通過網上訂購槍支，但必須從本州有執照的銷售商取貨。
槍支管理
持槍是受美國憲法（第二修正案）保障的公民權利，既然是公民權利就是所有沒有重罪記錄的成年公民都可以持槍。但是憲法沒有規定槍支的類型，所以給聯邦和各州對於槍支管理有不同的解釋。大多數州對非全自動長槍限制較少，通過即時犯罪前科檢查沒有問題的可以立即買槍且不需要注冊登記，也就是政府不知道誰有槍。購買手槍的要求一般高一些，有些州需要登記。
一些槍支法律比較友善的州，只要交錢填表再經過非常嚴格的審查，基本上可以買到任何限制的輕武器(機槍，全自動步槍，短槍管步槍，消聲器等)。槍支法律較嚴的州(加州，紐約州，伊利諾州等)需要考槍牌。
50個州中有48個州允許隱匿持槍(手槍上膛隨身攜帶)，這些州中的大部分需要考持槍證，合格的話一定要發證。沒有隱匿持槍證的話帶槍外出每個州的法律基本上都要槍支空膛上鎖並和彈葯分開放在汽車後備箱或直接拿不到的地方。只要合法，槍支攜帶沒有什麼地域限制，坐飛機也可以(槍支上鎖托運)。

年齡限制

2018 年2月22日，美國將把最低購槍年齡的門檻從18歲提高到21歲，實行更嚴格的購槍者背景審查程序，禁用「撞火槍托」等裝置。

C. 關於美國槍支的英文PPT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States
裡面有需要的美國槍控

D. 美國槍械法的各州市紛繁的槍械法

如果你想了解各州的規定，你可以到美國步槍協會的網頁上去查詢，他們有很詳盡各州的資料。
一般而言，各地的警察局， 是負責管理的單位。小地方的警長，有絕對的權力。大城市裹，就可能要經過好幾個單位，有時，連一般的的警察也搞不清楚繁復的法令。 還好一般的槍店都對當地的情況十分清楚，他們也會很樂意幫忙，因為幫了你也等於給他們提供一個潛在的客戶。 在這里，要強調當地兩個字，有如以上所說的，各州(State)，各鄉(County)，各市(City， Town)都可能有不一樣的規定， 一過了界，就可能大不相同。 譬如說長島(Long Island， New York)的槍店，對紐約市(New York City， New York)的規定可能就不是那麼清楚，就算知道，他也可能沒有必要的表格。 千萬要搞清楚，不要莫名其妙的犯了法，還不知道是為什麼呢。 在紐約州，各式各樣的半自動步槍並不列入管制，但是在紐約市，就完全是另一回事了，半自動步槍如果有以下的一樣特徵，就屬於非法：
突出的手槍把，
彈匣容量超過五發，
槍口制退器，
刺刀座，
榴彈發射器，
有節上護蓋，
摺合式槍托，
按照這個規定，所有的M16，M14，AK，SKS類型步槍都屬於非法。
同一州尚且如此，何況是別的地方。所以要談槍械管制，必須要先講清楚是那一個州。
一般來說，東北部管的比較嚴，可是也有例外，像緬因州(Maine)，新罕布希爾州(New Hampshire)就很松。中西部管的比較松，可是也有例外，芝加哥(Chicago)從一九八六年起，不允許私人擁有手槍，號稱無槍市。那才是個大笑話，芝加哥的黑社會，人人有槍，連十歲小孩都有槍，是美國槍械犯罪最嚴重的都市之一。而美國總有一些政客異想天開，認為他們所有的問題，都是因為槍械公司引起的，所以二十幾個市政府一齊具狀告入法庭， 一共告了二十幾家槍械製造公司－包括了格拉克(Glock)，貝瑞塔(Beretta)等， 幾乎一網打盡所有的名廠，他們認為有了煙草業賠償的先例，他們也應該穩操勝算。 在一九九九年許多州立法， 禁止任何市政府控告槍廠或只能僱用按時計酬的律師(因為如此， 律師們就不能采拆帳分贓的方式獲利， 惡訟師們對此也就失去了興趣)等等相應措施， 為反槍械管制扳回一成。 紐約市分成五個區 ━ 曼哈頓區Manhattan， 布魯克林(布魯侖) 區Brooklyn， 皇後Queens區， 史泰登島區Staten Island 及 布朗士區Bronx， 實行相同的槍械管製法， 可以私人擁有槍械。
步槍比較簡單的， 採用登記制， 只要是紐約市不禁止的， 隨時可以購買， 沒有限制。 AK， SKS， M16， USR 等是禁止的， Mini-14， Ruger 10/22， M1A等屬於合法。 在要開始的時候，， 先到皇後大道(Queens Blvd., 在Union Turnpike)上最高法院(Queens Court)的一個步槍管制中心去申請一張槍證， 需相片兩張和七十元匯票(郵局就在旁邊)。 大約等三個月， 槍證會寄下來。 此後就可以到槍店去買步槍。 買了之後， 槍商或你自己， 要將一張出售證明， 寄到Queens 的步槍管制中心去存檔。
手槍比較麻煩。 手槍的許可證有許多種， 有一種是居家證(Residential Permit)， 沒什麼用途， 只能放在家裡以及在指定的日子帶到靶場去。 而帶槍證(Conceal Carry Permit)一般人是幾乎不可能拿到的， 在此只談談打靶證(Target Permit)。 首先要加入一個射擊俱樂部， 一般有靶場的槍店都有附設俱樂部， 然後要到紐約市警局(在曼哈頓的下城， Police Plaza， 市府旁邊)去按指紋， 交申請書和費用， 槍店可以代為填表， 但是必須本人到警局去完成手續。 前後開支大約要五百元左右。 繳了申請表之後， 大約三個月左右， 警察局會通知申請人去面談， 如果一切順利， 大約六個月左右可以拿打靶證和一張許可證(Purchase permit)， 可以買一把手槍!!! 手槍的購買必須在許可證發出後的三十天之內完成， 否則失效。 買了槍之後， 必須在四十八小時內把槍帶到市警局呈檢。 這樣才算完成所有合法的程序。 三個月後， 可以再申請購買， 購買許可證大約要等兩個月左右， 而且申請書上要聲明所要的口徑。
附帶的規定有， 沒有手槍槍照的人， 不得」持有」(Posses)， 也就是說不可以租槍或是把玩。 (所以在紐約州州界之內， 除了軍人， 執法人員和少數特例之外， 將手槍交到沒有手槍槍照的人手上， 就犯了法。 一九九八年電視上某次辯論槍械管制問題時， 有一位外地來的手槍管制協會的人， 在節目中拿了一把手槍指指點點， 由於錄影室在曼哈頓， 事後NRA就公開質問紐約市市警局， 為什麼沒有將他逮捕? 可見執法不公)。 持打靶證的人， 只能在」直接」往返靶場時帶著槍， 途中必須是空槍(Unloaded)， 而且放在一個鎖起來的容器(Locked box)中。 法規中言明， 每人以一把槍為原則， 也就是說， 讓不讓買第二把手槍， 完全是由他。
這些規定， 光看頭都昏了。 如果住在紐約市的朋友想要買槍， 最好的辦法， 是在電話簿上找一家有靶場的槍店， 去和他們談一談， 他們一般都很願意幫忙的。千萬不要相信任何人聲稱可以代辦或者走後門， 這我不敢說沒有， 只是我不信你運氣那麼好。

E. 求英語作文：關於美國人用槍權利問題

Gun Control Essay Since disarming the citizens of this country is the objective of the federal government, and since the federal government proclaims this to be a democratic country based upon equality, then any gun control measures adopted by the government should be democratically applied. If law abiding citizens are to have their guns taken from them then let the law abiding police agencies of the state be disarmed also. (Those in law enforcement who are crooked can keep their guns just as the drug pushers and criminal elements in the civilian population at large will keep theirs.) Democracy based on equality requires that, so far as possible all are to be democratically equal. Why should the police, FBI, and federal marshals remain armed while citizens are not? Let us look at this issue in an intelligent, reasonable manner and examine the arguments. It will be said of those in favor of non-democratic gun control that the police come into contact with dangerous criminal elements and need guns to defend themselves as well as to enforce the laws. This is, of course, quite true, but is it not equally true for the citizens of this country? Are they not the chief victims of crime? Do they not need to protect themselves? In most cases, the policeman or FBI agent is much more able to defend himself as a result of training, physical conditioning, and experience than, say, a woman at a shopping mall who is dragged into an attacker's van and raped while her child is beaten unconscious by the assailant. Why, in a equal democratic society, would laws be passed that would provide a pistol for the police officer and not for the woman? Does not the woman as a citizen enjoy the same right to self defense as a police officer? Do not citizens have the same right to defend themselves as FBI agents? For every law enforcement officer that comes into contact with a criminal there are 7,653 citizens that are victimized by criminals. A citizen is 800 times more likely to be the victim of crime than a law enforcement officer, yet those who control the Federal government in Washington wish to make it illegal for any citizens to defend himself! The best place to stop crime is at the time of it's occurrence; in other words, were the 7,653 citizens armed they could in most cases prevent the crime at the point of it's occurrence. The police almost always arrive at the scene of a crime after the occurrence of the crime. Logically speaking, if the rules governing gun ownership are to be un-democratically applied, it makes far more sense to disarm the police than the citizens. The police can of course, once the one week waiting period is over, obtain a firearm just like citizens. Their arms should, however, be kept under lock and key at the police station. Then, just like citizens, if they get into trouble they can call 911 for armed help to come save them. One week waiting periods before the purchase of a firearm should be democratically applied. If it makes sense for a citizen to be required to wait a week in order to buy a firearm for protection, then it makes equally good sense for the police and FBI to do the same. Innocent people are killed every year by both agencies. If enforcement agencies had to wait a week before they could get a pistol, countless lives would be saved. A true example of this type of situation occurred recently in Houston, Texas where two armed robbers held up a large super market. The police advised of a hold up in progress placed officers at all exits. As the holp progressed and shoppers became aware of the stickup, several tried to flee the robbers. The first three shoppers out the door were shot by a female police officer, two died. How does a one week waiting period sound for this police officer? Now, it can be argued that most officers never shoot an innocent person with their side arms. Quite true. The same is true for most citizens who own guns. If our cites are so safe that citizens do not need guns, then the President's secret service guards should be disarmed. Is the president any more deserving of his life than the citizens who elected him? Democracy, where art thou? It seems clear that government elitists don't trust citizens who own guns. Can citizens trust a government who owns all the guns? Perhaps the federal government has something planned for the citizens of America that requires them to be disarmed? Bought any stock in the "New World Order" yet? It's originators, socialist elitists in Washington D.C., specify that worldwide disarmament must be instituted for the NWO to begin. You did not really think that this just meant foreign armies did you? Of course the enforcers of the NWO are to be allowed to keep their guns. How else can they see that you, a simple citizen, go along with their program? One has to ask himself what kind of country this would be if only criminals and government agents have arms. Perhaps the simple peasants who were in Tienanmen Square, or the Croatian and Slovakian citizens seen throwing rocks at tanks can best answer this question. Gun control works. Ask any government agent from Red Square to the steps of the White House. For those who can think, the words "gun control" or "New World Order" instinctively cause us to throw a thirty round clip into our weapon, for we are aware that the biggest criminals are the ones who live in Washington D.C.

採納哦

F. 您好,在網上看到您有關於美國槍支管理之類的英文原文,能給我發一下嗎,謝謝,急用.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/06/gun-control-america
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/07/07/the-rise-of-gun-violence-as-a-public-health-issue

G. 美國槍擊事件頻發，美國憲法都頒布過哪些相關規定

《美國憲法》修正案第二條規定：“一支訓練有素的民兵，對一個自由州的安全實為必要，民眾擁有並且佩帶槍支的權利不容侵犯。”這就是美國人可以在一些約束條件下持有槍支的法律依據。

憲法第二修正案於1791年寫入憲法，屬於聞名於世界的“權利法案”的中的一條，緊隨保護言論自由的憲法第一修正案。由此可見保護佩帶槍支權利的悠久歷史。這個就是美國人可以在一些約束條件下持有槍支的法律依據。

原因有下：

那麼，人民如何使用權利廢除違背人民意願的政府？當時憲法起草人傑佛遜認為，只有百姓有持槍權才能將這種權力付諸實踐。美國憲法規定，任何條文可以根據將來的情況加以修改，但百姓自由持槍這一條絕對不能改，因此，它被寫在了美國憲法第二條修正案當中：“人民持有和攜帶武器的權利不得侵犯。”

H. 美國使用槍支的由來介紹中英版 可包括一些恐怖事件的翻譯 急用 謝謝

American gun culture has a long history. It came into being in the early America. In the 16th century, when the initial（最初的） batch（一批） of European immigrants settled in American continent, they often faced with fierce animals』 attacks, conflictions with American Indians and European Powers』 invasions. Under these circumstances, a gun played an increasing important role in defending peoples』 personnel safeties(人生安全). In the Independences War, militias』 decisive contribution strengthened American people』s senses of owning a gun. Militias』 first gunshot in Lexington(萊剋星敦) drawn open for Independence War. Since then, according to many Americans, the United States could gain the independence because of every James holding a gun. In Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, American 16th president, encouraged every citizen to possess a gun. Therefore, American people regarded having a gun as an inalienable(不可剝奪的) right.
In the provisions of Bill of Right, the second is that every James has the right to holding a gun. It is the legal basis of population of a gun in the USA. So to speak, a gun like hamburgers, hotdogs and rock music has become an indispensable(不可或缺的)part of American culture.
這都是我自己寫的，都比較簡單。我就省去中文翻譯了，希望對你有幫助

I. 求英文原句:人民有拿起槍反抗暴政的天賦權利（美國憲法）

1 美國開國元勛托馬斯·傑斐遜（第三任美國總統）曾有一句名言：「只有一個國家的統治者被隨時提醒，人民保留有反抗的精神，這個國家才能保持自由。讓人民拿起武器來吧!」
2 美國憲法第二條修正案規定：「管理良好的民兵是保障自由州的安全所必需,人民持有和攜帶武器的權利不得侵犯。」
這是美國歷史上第一部也是最具權威性的關於公民持槍權的法律規定，美國公民擁有槍支是合法行為，受憲法等一系列法律保護。該修正案並不是說憲法給了人民擁有武器的權利，而是說，人民擁有和攜帶武器的權利不可侵犯。美國的建國者認為，這種權利，不是任何人給予人民的一種恩賜，而是一種天賦人權。

因此，求英文原句，恐難如願

1789年生效的《憲法修正案》也叫《權利法案》的持槍條款：
「A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.」 「組織良好的民兵隊伍，對於一個自由國家的安全是必需的，人民擁有和攜帶武器的權利不可侵犯。」

J. 關於中國和美國槍支管理區別的英語作文

The Control of Guns 26 Last week, there was unexpected disaster happened in Kunming, a group of gangster showed up in the Kunming train station, took out their knives, cutting people, many people died of the accident. What a tragical accident. It reminds me of the gun shot accidents happened in campus in America. America is not so strict to the control of guns, people can buy guns when they get registered, people can use the gun to hunt animals. While the lose management of the guns brings many tragedies, there is always news about gun shot accident in campus, the murders are teenagers. People are shocked by the news, they call on the government to control the guns, in case the teenagers have access to the guns. Compared to America, our country is very strict to the guns, so the gangsters of Kunmingdisaster use knives instead of guns. The government has done a good job on gun management.