大學合同法ppt課件
『壹』 我們上經濟法的課,講課件的主題是合同法。案例是可口可樂收購匯源的案例。
拜託 重點是收購啊 不簽合同這么大的倆公司能說並就並了啊 出了問題怎麼解決 不全靠合同的約定啊
『貳』 哪裡有合同法、勞動合同法、禁毒法的課件資料或者ppt下載
新浪資料看看有沒有
『叄』 各位法學院的前輩們,誰有合同法、勞動法的講義或ppt
我有,但怎麼給你呢
『肆』 大學的《合同法》主要是講什麼的難不難
在我國,合同法是調整平等主體之間的交易關系的法律,它主要規定合同的訂立、合同的效力及合同的履行、變更、解除、保全、違約責任等問題。1999年3月15日第九屆全國人民代表大會第二次會議通過,是最新版本的合同法。下載地址: http://bbs.zzue.com/thread-6095-1-3.html
『伍』 求《合同法學(第二版)》陳小君主編的 ppt 要完整的 好的話會加分的
綠林中發出轟轟的迴音,
和睦相處的白樺成群結隊
鞠著躬歡迎我們…
火車頭噴出的哈哈白煙
像一團團棉絮向四處彌漫,
或者隨風飄舞,或者抓住車頭,
最後都無可奈何地落向地面
『陸』 請幫忙做一個用英文介紹國際合同法的PPT,萬分感謝
Contract law regulates the exchange of promises between parties to perform or refrain from performing an act enforceable in a court of law. Contracts can be formed from oral or written agreements. The concept of a "contract" is based on the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).[27] In common law jurisdictions, three key elements to the creation of a contract are necessary: offer and acceptance, consideration and the intention to create legal relations. In Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company a medical firm advertised that its new wonder drug, the smokeball, would cure people's flu, and if it did not, the buyers would get £100. Many people sued for their £100 when the drug did not work. Fearing bankruptcy, Carbolic argued the advert was not to be taken as a serious, legally binding offer. It was an invitation to treat, mere puff, a gimmick. But the court of appeal held that to a reasonable man Carbolic had made a serious offer. People had given good consideration for it by going to the "distinct inconvenience" of using a faulty proct. "Read the advertisement how you will, and twist it about as you will", said Lord Justice Lindley, "here is a distinct promise expressed in language which is perfectly unmistakable".[28]
"Consideration" indicates the fact that all parties to a contract have exchanged something of value. Some common law systems, including Australia, are moving away from the idea of consideration as a requirement. The idea of estoppel or culpa in contrahendo, can be used to create obligations ring pre-contractual negotiations.[29] In civil law jurisdictions, consideration is not required for a contract to be binding.[30] In France, an ordinary contract is said to form simply on the basis of a "meeting of the minds" or a "concurrence of wills". Germany has a special approach to contracts, which ties into property law. Their 'abstraction principle' (Abstraktionsprinzip) means that the personal obligation of contract forms separately from the title of property being conferred. When contracts are invalidated for some reason (e.g. a car buyer is so drunk that he lacks legal capacity to contract)[31] the contractual obligation to pay can be invalidated separately from the proprietary title of the car. Unjust enrichment law, rather than contract law, is then used to restore title to the rightful owner.[32]