合同法英文assignment3

⑴ assignment中举例用英文怎么说

您好，领学网为您来解答自：
assignment 英 [əˈsaɪnmənt] 美 [əˈsaɪnmənt] n.分给，分配;任务，工作，（课外）作业;<美>任命;指定，委派
复数： assignments
例句： The assessment for the course involves written assignments and practical tests. 这门功课的考核包括书面作业和实际操作考试。
望采纳！

⑵ 如何学好法律英语（3）

法律英语学习经验之三 一、我反对为英语而英语的“纯英语”主义。 人生苦短，而学海无涯。中、小学教育，偏重于基础，升入大学，便有了专业定向；工作之后，分工更细、定向更明确。学英语也是一样，要有明确的专业定向。同学们都希望法律英语的学习更有效率，也就是说在相对短的时间里，进步更快、成果更大。须专一精进，心无旁骛，放可中此鹄的。 国内关于英语的学习资料，主要有三大类：一是所谓“应试英语”，四六级、托福、雅斯等，这些东西，都是敲门砖，不是真知识。如果没有特殊需要（如出国或参加考试），不可以此学英语。另一类，可以称为“文化英语”，诸如名人演说、世界名著、英文电影、歌曲等，用来做个辅助和消遣可以，万万不能因此荒废专业；还有，就是“教科书英语”，从入门到精通、英语背诵文选、高级英文等等不一而足，同学们应该将之视为基本教材，学一套足以。一本一本地看下去，便是浪费时日了。凡此种种，都是“为英语而英语”的纯英语读物。 “纯英语”主义，说到底，是一种应试教育与出版社商业利益联姻的产物。学校、考试机构和出版商利用大众希望学好英语的心态，一方轻佻地许诺“精通”、“高级”“无敌”“高效（三十天就能流利对话？）”，另一方不断推出各类考试，颁发各种证书，证明考生的英语水平。不断地有四级、六级、托福满分的神话传出，鼓动学子浮躁的心。 我在大学就过了六级，但初次与老外谈判，却如聋如哑，如白痴一般。来澳洲后，曾经在中餐馆打工，认识一些厨师、老板，完全不懂英文，或者只能说几句蹩脚的唐人街英文，生活也没有什么不方便，收入也比多数澳洲本地人要高得多。澳洲法学院的一个小师弟，12岁随父母移民来澳洲，英文几乎成为母语，中文只听说，不能读写，他很羡慕我的双语优势，我说：“但是你的英文很好啊！”他回答：“英文好有什么用，谁都会讲英语！”。我的英文不是很好，进饭馆不会点菜、别人将笑话听不大懂，看电视、听广播，最多懂80％，但有几次作业（这里称“assignment”）在全班80几个学生中，却得了最高分。 我的意思是：（1）英语水平的高低，不能通过考试来评价（试问：通过专业八级的中国学生的英语水平与美国街头辍学少年相比，孰高孰低？）；（2）学习英语的重要性不是绝对的，做外贸的当然要学英语，可是，如果北京的哥不会说“hello”，难道老外就不来看奥运了吗？（3）学英语没有专业定向，实用价值不大。有些人甚至建议，一字一句的听写VOA。即使VOA100％听懂，也就是美国的中小学生的听力水平。对于一个中国人，花上千个小时，100％听懂VOA或能流利背诵林肯讲演，又有什么实用价值呢？ 纯英语主义，是一层窗户纸，大家谁都不想捅破！政府为了与世界接轨，需要英语人才，可对人才的评定，也只能通过考试；学校有教学计划，招生名额，考试通过率的要求，自然强调考试的重要；出版商出于利益最大化的考虑，当然喜欢出版大众读物（专业英语书籍有几个人买？）；海归派回国后，为了混饭吃或者炫耀，时不时蹦哒出几个单词，有意无意之间，也跟强调大众英语的重要性。谁都不捅破的结果，就是误人子弟，象困在地牢里的令狐冲，炼吸星****，结果炼倒了。 纯英语主义，是将手段视为目的。语言是文化的载体，学好英语的目的，对于中国人，是更好的交流、借鉴、吸收和评价。而现代社会又以分工细密、专业化为其特征。所以，在国内学英语没有专业定向，就是浪费时间。一句话，英语是钥匙。如果你天天为钥匙打光上腊，装金贴银，却始终不知道开哪扇门，你就是“纯英语主义者”，基本上是傻瓜的代名词。 二、我反对好高骛远的“名著主义” 学习法律英文，一定要脚踏实地，从基础学起。基础就是教科书。教科书有两特点：（1）介绍基本的专业词汇、逻辑分类和推理过程；（2）使读者对一门学问有一个整体的把握。 名著和经典往往是对以往学问的总结、批判，进而提出新理论、新观点。因此，这些书不适合初学者作为入门教材来阅读。因为，没有这些基础知识、背景资料作为铺垫，费了半天劲，也是一头雾水。 比如，中国法律界一时对公平和效率的问题，探讨颇多，基本问题：“是先把蛋糕做大（efficiency）还是先把蛋糕分均（equity）”。围绕着这一问题，各种法学和经济学的经典、名著满天飞。如果要研究这个问题，其实应该首先读一本法理学教科书，了解“公平”的定义；再读一本经济学教科书，了解“效率”是什么。然后在看看这一争论的始作俑者，美国的“经济分析法学派”提出这一理论的历史背景是什么。然后才能真正明白“whataretheytalkingabout?”。这样，你会发现，其关键问题，在于“交易成本（transactioncost）”理论的提出。然后，我们反问：中国法律的交易成本有多高，是否高到影响效率了？ 因此，建议同学，在读所谓经典、权威、名著之前，安静下来，读几本教科书，把基本理论、概念搞清楚。在这点上，用中文学法律和用英文学，没有任何区别。 三、我反对不求甚解的“范本主义” 借助英汉词典翻译法律文书，通过“外贸书信选”或“涉外合同范本”学习法律英语，可以“速成”，不能通达。另外，“范本”并不规范，错译、曲解、牵强附会的地方很多。 我在国内做律师的时候，见到过很多“翻译公司”翻译的合同文本，其错讹之多，令人惊讶。原因很简单，字词只有在特定语境中，才有意义。法律英语学习者遇到的尴尬局面是，多数中英文的法律词汇，都不能准确互译。比如我在论坛中曾经解释过的“法人”一词，不能译为“legalperson”，因为“legalperson”在普通法中是指能够独立承担法律后果的人，既包括自然人，也包括法人。所以，法人应该译为“bodycorporate”。 所以，范本用以用来应急或者做个参考，但不能作为学习资料使用。最好的教材还是教科书（Textbook）。 另外，最好手头有一本英文法律词典，含有对法律名词的英文解释，尽量不用或少用英汉法律词典。我曾经用过三本英汉法律词典，都是强译，没有对相关词条的解释。比如：“tribunal”在法律出版社出版的《英汉法律词典》中，被定义为(1)法庭、裁判所；（2）法官席、审判员席；（3）裁判、批判。如果在法律文书中出现“”，该如何翻译能？如果按该字典的解释，将这句话翻译为“在法院或裁判所进行的程序”，这到底是什么意思？什么是“裁判所”？其实，tribunal一词与法院相对，指行政裁量机关，也就是独立于法院之外的，对行政行为有权做实质性审查(meritsreview)的机关。（注：中国没有类似机关，因此不能直译） 四、我反对“多多益善”主义 英语国家的法律，都继承英国普通法传统，既包括成文法（statute）也包括判例法（caselaw）。如新西兰这样的小国的“法律”，印出来，也比四库全书多，而且还在不断地增加。不要说美国、加拿大、澳洲还有联邦立法和州立法之分！ 因此，即使是澳洲最高院****官，也不敢说他精通“法律”（除非喝多了）。我们这些中国学习者，更不能奢望太多。所以，即使是法律书籍，也要有选择，不能看得太杂。如果对合同法感兴趣，建议先攻合同法总论。通了之后，再读合同法分论（如货物购销合同、技术转让许可合同等等） 前面说的专业定向，也包括在法律内的专业选择。以一两个法律部类为主，其他相关部类为辅，这才是一个聪明而有效的学习法。忽而宪法、忽而刑法、忽而国际法，看似花哨，也只是花拳绣腿而已。 另外，国内还有一些所谓法律英语教材，东拼西凑了一些文章，加上注释和译文，既无体系，又无侧重。这类读物，只能算作英文教材，不能当法律书学习。我们既然不能靠读法律文摘学中文法律，同样不能这样学英文法律。总结： （1）学习法律英语，是用英文学习法律，不是通过阅读法律资料学习英文。所以，要用法律的方法学习；不能用语言的方法学习。因此，我反对“纯英文”主义； （2）法律的方法，就是从基础学起，找到法律发展的逻辑起点，了解名词术语的特定含义，把握法律单元的整体构架。唯一能够满足这一要求的就是教科书。因此，我反对“名著”主义。 （3）知其然，不知其所以然，是“记问之学”，古人说，“记问之学，不足以为人师”，因为背来背去，都是别人的东西，没有自己的心得，不是真实的学问。学习法律英语也是一样。因此，我反对“范本”主义。 （4）最后，法律涉及面太广，因此，必须有专业定向，有选择，有取舍，有主次，有先后。把有限的时间安排好。否则，枉费心血，一事无成。因此，我反对“多多益善”主义。

⑶ 债权转让的问题

1、债权人可以将合同抄的权利全部或者部分转让给第三人，但有下列情形之一的除外：（1）根据合同性质不得转让；（2）按照当事人约定不得转让；（3）依照法律规定不得转让。2、债权人转让权利的，应当通知债务人。未经通知，该转让对债务人不发生效力。3、债权人转让权利的通知不得撤销，但经受让人同意的除外。4、债权人转让权利的，受让人取得与债权有关的从权利，但该从权利专属于债权人自身的除外。5、债务人接到债权转让通知后，债务人对让与人的抗辩，可以向受让人主张。6、债务人接到债权转让通知时，债务人对让与人享有债权，并且债务人的债权先于转让的债权到期或者同时到期的，债务人可以向受让人主张抵销。

⑷ Transfer，Assignment，Charge和Pledge的区别

先看assign和transfer.两者均有转让的意思，但又有区别。请看以下法律词典的词条。
assign 转让；动产转让转让财产，尤指转让属人财产或动产〔personal or moveable property〕。在英格兰，动产转让是指属人动产、实产〔real property〕中的动产权益〔chattle interest〕或实产中的衡平法权益〔equitable interest〕的完全转让。它可以是无偿的，也可以是有偿的。在苏格兰，动产转让是指将债权、股权、版权、保险单等无形财产权完全或仅作为担保加以转让的方式。并非所有权利都可转让，某些特定类型的权利转让需要特殊的手续。
transfer n.(1)转换；转移指对财产或其利益进行处理和分割的任何方式，包括金钱的支付、免除债务、租赁、设置负担等，也包括财产权的保留;它可以采用直接或间接、无条件或附条件、自愿或强制等各种类型的方法。(2)流通指按照法律形式进行票据流通，包括通过背书、支付、转让和法律规定等方式。(3)转让指财产或所有权等的让与。
v.(4)移转尤指改变占有或支配。(5)卖给；赠给。
----元照英美法词典
assign 让与，动产转让
transfer （所有权的）让与（把一个人的权利转让给另一人），（物权、产权等）转让
transfer, assignment, conveyance, negotiation 均有转让的含义。transfer 为一般术语,可泛指各种转让；assignment多为民法或合同法上的债权让与,且常指转让无形财产的权利；conveyance 多指不动产,如土地物权（title）的转让,其也包括土地其他权利的转让或租赁（lease）、按揭（mortgage）或抵押（encumbrance）；negotiation 常指票据法上的权利转让
----英汉法律英语大辞典
从元照英美法律词典没太看出两个术语的区别。但依据英汉法律用语大辞典，transfer为一般术语，而assignment多用于民法和合同法上的债权让与，及无线财产的权利的让与。但查布莱克法律词典第八版，assign用convey和transfer解释。而transfer则用convey, remove from, pass or hand over from,但指出尤指占有和支配的改变。可见这两个术语虽然同义，但还是有区别的。
再看charge和pledge.
charge 担保；负担为保证债务的清偿或义务的履行而在土地或其他财产上设定的抵押权〔mortgage〕、留置权〔lien〕或其他无特别名称的担保权利，如果土地所有人或其所担保的人未偿还债务或履行义务——例如纳税、支付遗产或年金等，担保权利人可以诉请变卖土地以抵偿债务。根据英国1925年《财产法》〔Law of Property Act〕，负担分为普通法所承认的土地负担——包括地租负担〔rent charge〕、普通法上的抵押〔legal mortgage〕、土地税负等——和衡平法上的土地负担〔equitable charge〕。后者存在於债权人未取得对土地的普通法地产权的情况，例如通过寄存产权文书设定衡平法上的抵押〔equitable mortgage〕，或者借款人本身只对土地享有衡平法上的权利。土地上的负担必须在土地登记局或类似政府主管机构登记，否则不能对抗已支付对价的买主。
pledge n.(1)质押债务人将其动产或无形财产证书交给债权人占有，作为履行债务的担保，债务人不履行债务时，债权人可变卖质物受偿，但在变卖前债务人还可通过履行债务赎回质物。在美国，有关质押的法律大多已被《统一商法典》〔U.C.C.〕第九章有关担保交易〔secured transactions〕的规定所替代。(2)(广义)保证；担保提供某些担保物作为履行债务的保证。(3)质物；典当物；担保物(4)(古)(复)诉讼保证人在普通法诉讼中，作为原告的保证人，其名字须附於起诉状〔declaration〕之末。后来由於不再对提出虚假请求的原告处以罚款，即纯粹成为一种形式，一般以虚构的人名John Doe和Richard Roe代替，或完全省略。
-----元照英美法词典
charge 抵押,财产负担
pledge 质押，质权v.质押；出质；典当
charge, mortgage, pledge, lien, hypothecation 均有债务人将其财产作质押担保的含义。在英美法中,担保包括人的担保（personal security）和物的担保（real security）两种。其中物的担保可分为三种类型：一为由债权人取得对担保物的所有权,而不依赖于对物的占有的担保；二是债权人不享有对担保物的所有权,但依赖于对物的占有的担保；三是既不依赖取得对物的所有权,也不依赖对物的占有的担保。属于第一类型的担保为mortgage（按揭）,属于第二类型的担保有pledge（质押）和lien（留置）,属于第三类型的担保有charge hypothecation。charge 和mortgage 经常用作不动产的担保中。它们在实务上尽管区别不大,但在理论上,尤其是房地产抵押上仍存在较大差异。charge 是指房地产所有者将某些权益赋予债权人,作为偿还债务或履行责任的担保,一旦抵押人无力偿还债务或履行责任,债权人即可行使这些权益,处置该抵押的房地产以获得清偿。charge不转移房地产所有权,而只是赋予债权人对房地产的某些权益,包括占有权益,故charge 十分等同大陆法系中的“抵押”,当然也有人主张将其译为“财产负担”。而mortgage 在香港则被译为“按揭”,指房地产按揭人将其房地产的产权（业权）移转给债权人,作为偿还债务的担保,但实际占有权却仍然为债务人所有。在按揭期间,债权人即成为按揭房地产的产权所有人,如债务人不履行债务或有其他违约行为,债权人可以按按揭房地产所有权人的名义起诉,取消按揭人的回赎权,从而取得按揭房地产的包括占有权在内的绝对产权（title）。过去内地多将mortgage 译为抵押,但鉴于该单词的内涵与大陆法系的抵押含义有一定差异,且目前内地已开始使用“按揭”这个术语（尽管从法的角度上看,内地现仍从大陆法系的抵押观念来认识按揭）,从翻译角度上讲,笔者认为最好能将mortgage 翻译为“按揭”。pledge为质押或质权,指占有权而非所有权的转移；而lien则为留置权；hypothecation 来源于罗马法中的hypotheca,在英美法中,其常用作指海商法中的船只或货物的抵押
-----英汉法律用语大辞典
可见charge和pledge都有债务人用财产为自己债务担保的含义。但charge指既不依赖取得对物的所有权,也不依赖对物的占有的担保，即我们所谓的抵押，而pledge指债权人不享有对担保物的所有权,但依赖于对物的占有的担保，即我们所谓的质押。而布莱克法律词典第八版对pledge的释义为：the act of providing something as security for a debt or obligation; A lment or other deposit of personal property to a creditor as security for a debt or obligation.而对charge的释义为：to impose a lien or claim, to ecumber.可见charge不仅指抵押，也有留置之意。但牛津法律词典第五版对charge 的释义如下：A legal or equitable interest in land, securing the payment of money. It gives the creditor in whose favour the charge is created (the chargee) the right to payment from the income or proceeds of sale of the land charged, in priority to claims against the debtor by unsecured creditors.可见charge主要指房地产所有人将地产上的某些权益给予债权人以作为债务的担保，翻译为“抵押”较妥。
可见assign和transfer虽同义，还是有区别的，但汉语翻译无法体现。但要忠于原文，故本人选择同义重复的译法，而charge和pledge分别译为“抵押”和“质押”。
见一网友翻译功底不错，其译文如下：
10.其他
10.1 本协议的任何一方，在未得到另一方的书面许可前，都不得将其根据本协议所享有的全部或任何权利或义务分派、转移、托管或抵押出去。

⑸ Assignment论文写作有需要注意的格式吗谁写过啊

一般而言，assignment包括以下几个部分：、introction、body、conclusion、reference、recommendation等，下面就来讲讲这几个部分如何写才符合要求。

Abstract (序);
一般，abstract只需要1-2段即可;
字数约为文章的10-15%;
Abstract的目的：让读者知道assignment的主要内容;
Abstract的开头：用自己的语言总结并解释文章题目，最好控制在1-2句话;
Abstract细节：概括assignment中写了什么，用2-3句话总结每个thesis;
Abstract的结尾：总结并延伸thesis和topic;
并不是每篇assignment都需要写abstract，需要tutor要求，就按照这样的形式写。

Introction(前言)：
一般，introction只需要1段即可，不可以分成2段来写;
约为文章总数的10%;
Introction的开头：1-2句解释文章题目;接下来用2句话左右介绍文章题目的background;
Introction的内容：主要介绍assignment中写了什么，以 firstly, I will discuss…, and then I will…, thirdly, I will…的形式介绍每个thesis，每个论点用几个词即可;
Introction不需要总结句

Body(文章的主体部分，即文章重点讨论的部分)：
每一个thesis都必须用一段来写，即每个段落只能出现一个thesis;
body部分不能出现I，he，she等人称代词，除非是举例子;
每一段话都有要introction，explanation，examples。下面将详细介绍这四个部分如何写;
Introction：用1-2句介绍本段的thesis或idea;
Explanation：用1-2句解释你的thesis;
Examples：举一些简单的例子支持你的thesis，这部分要重点写，举例子很宽泛，可以用名人说的话，专业文章的观点，自己的亲身经历都可以用来举例子;
Body一般有3-6个thesis，如果文章的字数在1000-3000字，body一般2-6段，每段要有联系，有层层深入的联系。

Conclusion：
一般，conclusion只需要一段即可，不可以分成2段来写;
字数约为文章总数的10%;
Conclusion的第1-2句解释文章题目;
Conclusion的内容：主要总结你文章thesis，每个thesis要用一句话;
Conclusion最后一句要延伸，但是不能出现新的thesis。
Introction和conclusion的区别
Introction是讲你assignment要写什么，只要用几个word概括你的thesis;
Conclusion是用1句话总结你的每个thesis，比introction详细;
Introction需要介绍题目的background，conclusion不用，只需要概括总结题目。

Recommendation
Recommendation是文章标题的缺陷
一般只要写一个thesis，提出解决办法，格式和body段落的要求是一样的：introction，explanation，example，然后用一句话做个conclusion
需要注意的是，一般情况下都不需要写recommendation。

⑹ assignment的英文解释

task or homework

⑺ c语言程序遇到invalid lvalue in assignment

||#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i;
for(a=1;a<=3;a++)
for(b=1;b<=9;a++)
for(c=1;c<=9;a++)
for(d=1;d<=9;a++)
for(e=1;e<=9;a++)
for(f=1;f<=9;a++)
for(g=1;g<=9;a++)
for(h=1;h<=9;a++)
for(i=1;i<=9;a++)
{
(a==b||a==c||a==d||a==e||a==f||a==g||a==h||a==i||b==c||b==d||b==e||b==f||b==g||b==h||b==i||c==d||c==e||c==f||c==g||c==h||c==i||d==e||d==f||d==g||d==h||d==i||e==f||e==g||e==h||e==i||f==g||f==h||f==i||g==h||g==i||h==i) continue;
if(3*(100*a+10*b+c)==(100*g+10*h+i)&&2/3*(100*d+10*e+f)==(100*g+10*h+i))
printf("%d\n%d\n%d\n",(100*a+10*b+c),(100*d+10*e+f),(100*g+10*h+i));
}
return 0;
}
错误我给你改了，不知道你程序的功能是什么，没有结果

⑻ 跪求一篇英文Assignment

这篇关于Group work，团队工作的，字数满多的，内容可以参考下：）~~

Different people have various opinions. Some poeple claim that teamwork surely beats working indivially; while others argue that working by oneself is better than worling in a group. On balance, I would say that there is no easy answer to this rather complicated issue. Which one is more proctive depends on the situation. In other words, sometimes it is good to work indivially; sometimes it is wiser to join a group.

Teamwork requires cooperative effort, people are more motivated and therefore more proctive working in teams than working indivially as competitors. My view is that this assertion is true only in some cases.

If one examines the business world, for example, it becomes clear that which approach is more effective in motivating people and in achieving proctivity depends on the specific job. In some jobs, proctivity dearly depends on the ability of co-workers to cooperate as members of a team. For businesses involved in the proction of procts through complex processes, all departments and divisions must work in lock-step fashion toward proct rollout. Cooperative interaction is even essential in jobs performed in relative isolation and in jobs in which technical knowledge or ability, not the ability to work with others, would seem to be most important. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines. Moreover, the kinds of people attracted to these jobs in the first place are likely to be motivated by a sense of common purpose rather than by indivial ambition.

In other types of jobs indivial competition, tenacity, and ambition are the keys to proctivity. For example, a commissioned salesperson's compensation, and sometimes tenure and potential for promotion as well, are based on comparative sales performance of co-workers. Working as competitors, a firm's indivial salespeople maximize proctivity-in terms of profit--both for themselves and for their firm. Key leadership positions also call, above all, for a certain tenacity and competitive spirit. A firm's founding entrepreneur must maintain this spirit in order for the firm to survive, let alone to maximize proctivity. Moreover, in my observation, the kinds of people inclined toward entrepreneurship and sales in the first place are those who are competitive by nature, not those who are motivated primarily by a sense of common purpose.

On balance, however, my view is that cooperation is more crucial for an organization's long-term proctivity than indivial competition. Even in jobs where indivial competitiveness is part-and-parcel of the job, the importance of cooperation should not be underestimated. Competition among sales people can quickly grow into jealousy, back stabbing, and unethical behavior all of which are counterproctive. And even the most successful entrepreneurs would no doubt admit that without the cooperative efforts of their subordinates, partners, and colleagues, their personal visions would never become reality.
We can not neglect the power of cooperation which can make the group work more efficient than indivial workers. The world today is charging at every minute, and people in the society can not catch themselves sometimes. They are busy striving for survive, studying for the improvement. But with the trend of world global more and more chances have been implied to people for their cooperation in their work. We will see Bill Gates the president of Microsoft when he drop out from Harvard University and make his own operating system--DOS, and now the Microsoft company has dominated the software field of PC market. During that time it is easier for an indivial to get success than today is. How it will going if you want someone to write the system of windows XP or windows 2000 all by himself? May be he can not finish the thouands of lines of code ring his whole life. Hence we will find how powerful teamwork is! With the cooperation in our work, we can finish a large work, solve a difficult problem, and achieve our own goals through the process.

But whether we can say that at any time we should put team work at first and throw the competition which can be take places by cooperation? What can indivial competition give us? This is not a hard question, and the thought of competition may in our brain since we go into our school. For the teachers give us a score in every test in order to show how well we have done in this lesson. The score not only brings us the one above but it also brings us the competition. Everyone want to be a successful man, so he will do his best to studying which can make him get a high mark in his final test. There is not any wrong with this phenomenon. But ring the process the competition among any indivial become more and more serious, the higher position you get, the more competition you will meet. It is not only in our daily studying, but in all the aspects of our daily life. So it is necessary for us to pay more attention to the way of competition. Whether it is right can lead you to different results.

So as we know, both the cooperation and the indivial competition are important for any group and the members of the group. We have talk about the cooperation and competition seperately above. But in my opinion it is not right to dividing the competition and cooperation into two parts. We should see in our world today the competition is needed fro the growth of any indivial with the premise that we have the idea that teamwork can help us make more efficient and happier in our work.

Teamwork means better outcome in certain cercumstances. In a team, you can not only feel the "peer presure" of other members in the group which is good to your proctivity, but also get help from others. My preparation of the Graate Record Examination is a good case in piont. At first I used to prepare for the test by myself. After a few weeks, however, I found it so difficlut remembering thousands of words as well as writing such difficult essays. I was about to give up. In order to get more motivation, I went to see a classmate who is also preparing for GRE, and asked him if we could prepare for the test together. As he agreed, from that day on, we talk to each other what we learned the day before, which soon I found to to be a good way of studying. When he told me that he remembered 50 new words, as I congratulated him, I told myself, "I am going to try to remember 55 today, more than you did". In addition, when we feel depressed, it was always good to tell each other how we felt. Once he found his girlfriend cheeting on him. He was so sad that he couldn't concerntrate on GRE preparation. However, as the saying goes, "A happiness shared by two is double happiness; a sorrow shared by two is half sorrow." As he shared his sorrow to me, he felt much better.Further more, we often lended our books to each other. Working in a group really helped both of us in a variety of aspects.

On the other hand, often times it is better working by our own than working with other people. What the manager of a cooperation usually do when he finds the proctivity of a group to remain low is cutting off the number of people in the group, down to only one at times. The reason is simple. When there are too many people in a group, it is rather difficult to reach an agreement, because different people hold different opinions, which results in a waste of time as the argument goes on. What's more, in some cases it is not necessary to havemore people wrking on a project. For instance, in the spacecraft "Shenzhou II" that China sent into the space, there is only one operator in it. The more people there are in the space craft, the more money the government spends, the more risk the government takes. As a result, having as less people as possible in such a big project means less investment and more security, and it surely brings up the proctivity.

In conclusion, it is not fair to say working indivially is more proctive than working in a group, or vice versa. Whether we choose to work by our won or jion in a group depands on the situation we are in.indivial competitiveness and ambition are essential motivating forces for certain types of jobs, while in other jobs it is a common sense of mission that motivates workers to achieve maximum proctivity. In the final analysis, however, the overall proctivity of almost every organization depends ultimately on the ability of its members to cooperate as a team.

⑼ 如何写英文论文的reading assignment

是国内的英文，还是留学的英文，差距是很大的哦，不能一概而论
网络“慧译通”，即可交流探讨，又可搞定任务，专业靠谱