大学合同法ppt课件
『壹』 我们上经济法的课,讲课件的主题是合同法。案例是可口可乐收购汇源的案例。
拜托 重点是收购啊 不签合同这么大的俩公司能说并就并了啊 出了问题怎么解决 不全靠合同的约定啊
『贰』 哪里有合同法、劳动合同法、禁毒法的课件资料或者ppt下载
新浪资料看看有没有
『叁』 各位法学院的前辈们,谁有合同法、劳动法的讲义或ppt
我有,但怎么给你呢
『肆』 大学的《合同法》主要是讲什么的难不难
在我国,合同法是调整平等主体之间的交易关系的法律,它主要规定合同的订立、合同的效力及合同的履行、变更、解除、保全、违约责任等问题。1999年3月15日第九届全国人民代表大会第二次会议通过,是最新版本的合同法。下载地址: http://bbs.zzue.com/thread-6095-1-3.html
『伍』 求《合同法学(第二版)》陈小君主编的 ppt 要完整的 好的话会加分的
绿林中发出轰轰的回音,
和睦相处的白桦成群结队
鞠着躬欢迎我们…
火车头喷出的哈哈白烟
像一团团棉絮向四处弥漫,
或者随风飘舞,或者抓住车头,
最后都无可奈何地落向地面
『陆』 请帮忙做一个用英文介绍国际合同法的PPT,万分感谢
Contract law regulates the exchange of promises between parties to perform or refrain from performing an act enforceable in a court of law. Contracts can be formed from oral or written agreements. The concept of a "contract" is based on the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).[27] In common law jurisdictions, three key elements to the creation of a contract are necessary: offer and acceptance, consideration and the intention to create legal relations. In Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company a medical firm advertised that its new wonder drug, the smokeball, would cure people's flu, and if it did not, the buyers would get £100. Many people sued for their £100 when the drug did not work. Fearing bankruptcy, Carbolic argued the advert was not to be taken as a serious, legally binding offer. It was an invitation to treat, mere puff, a gimmick. But the court of appeal held that to a reasonable man Carbolic had made a serious offer. People had given good consideration for it by going to the "distinct inconvenience" of using a faulty proct. "Read the advertisement how you will, and twist it about as you will", said Lord Justice Lindley, "here is a distinct promise expressed in language which is perfectly unmistakable".[28]
"Consideration" indicates the fact that all parties to a contract have exchanged something of value. Some common law systems, including Australia, are moving away from the idea of consideration as a requirement. The idea of estoppel or culpa in contrahendo, can be used to create obligations ring pre-contractual negotiations.[29] In civil law jurisdictions, consideration is not required for a contract to be binding.[30] In France, an ordinary contract is said to form simply on the basis of a "meeting of the minds" or a "concurrence of wills". Germany has a special approach to contracts, which ties into property law. Their 'abstraction principle' (Abstraktionsprinzip) means that the personal obligation of contract forms separately from the title of property being conferred. When contracts are invalidated for some reason (e.g. a car buyer is so drunk that he lacks legal capacity to contract)[31] the contractual obligation to pay can be invalidated separately from the proprietary title of the car. Unjust enrichment law, rather than contract law, is then used to restore title to the rightful owner.[32]